
‘Humans’ Cancelled After 3 Seasons. No Season 4.
Some really sad news… ‘Humans‘ has been cancelled after 3 Seasons.
The news came from show creators Jonathan Brackley & Sam Vincent who released a statement on social media today saying “Sadly there won’t be a 4th season of Humans. In this age of unprecedented choice and competition, we can have no complaints. Channel 4 & AMC were the perfect partners. They supported the show brilliantly and above all – let us make three seasons!”
They go on to say they are “gutted”, but feel lucky they got to make the show they wanted to make for 24 episodes. They go on to thank the cast and crew, and, of course, the fans.
The critically acclaimed drama series set in a parallel present where the latest must-have gadget for a busy family is a Synth – a life-like humanoid. Whilst things started out okay, they quickly deteriorate when synths begin to gain consciousness, leading to a decimated and oppressed Synth population fights to survive in a world that hates and fears them.
The drama starred Gemma Chan as Mia, Emily Berrington as Niska, Ivanno Jeremiah as Max, Colin Morgan as Leo, Katherine Parkinson as Laura, Theo Stevenson as Toby, Tom Goodman-Hill as Joe, Lucy Carless as Mattie, and Pixie Davies as Sophie.
Here at Geektown, we have a huge affection for the series, cast and crew who were always lovely to us. We have interviewed many of the cast, been on set visits, and even got to appear in the AI documentary they did, hosted by Gemma Chan. It will be sorely missed.
Commenting on any leftover plot points, Brackley and Vincent say “we know we left some threads hanging… Maybe one day we’ll get a chance to pick them back up. If there’s anyone out there with a few million quid and an interest in AI stories, we’re all ears. DM us Elon.”
Do it Elon, do it!
You can read the full statement below:


6 comments
Meh. Considering this once-good show completely jumped the shark in the series 3 finale and threw out all believability of their technological premise, I say good riddance.
Spot on. As per my other comments on this thread it totally lost its way and just became jingoistic left wing metaphors all over the place….
That is not at all what I meant. “Humans” always dealt with politically progressive themes – which is why it was such a good show. (And I don’t even mean metaphors. If humanity ever really manages to create self-aware artificial intelligence, then we’ve basically created a slave race, which would not be good for anyone – neither the oppressed androids nor human society that would necessarily revert back to cruel attitudes to justify the oppression. Plus, you know, the unemployment problems that we already get from automated factories and soon self-driving taxis / trucks. So we better start thinking about the social and ethical ramifications of this potential development now, before we get surprised by the problems it creates. This is exactly what good sci-fi is for: the “what if” of the influence on society that current technological trends could have. By the way, a good British sci-fi book that explores this angle (in a funny and rather raunchy manner, since the protagonist is a former sex bot) is “Saturn’s Children” by Charles Stross. It’s not really about a robot rebellion or anything that obvious (it’s set in the far future, after humanity has long gone extinct for natural reasons, leaving all the many and varied robot servants to go on exploring the universe without their masters) and the plot is really more a mix of spy thriller and a parody of the old pulpy “planetary adventure” genre from the 1950s/1960s, but it’s still a book I would recommend to anyone who still thinks hard-coding sentient/sapient robots with Asimov’s Three Laws is a good idea. Bonus points for having one of the “hardest” (most realistic) approaches to long-distance space travel that I’ve ever seen in sci-fi. Which rather leaves you with the impression that we will absolutely NEED A.I. robots to spread our species and the rest of Earth lifeout to the stars – so you better hope that this entire ethical discussion doesn’t turn out to be moot because sentience cannot be artificially created.)
Anyway, what lead me to give up on this show was how they started more and more to treat the android technology as if it was plain magic. I forget what the straw that broke camel’s back was exactly – it’s been a while since I watched season 3, though I do remember being extremely disappointed by the season finale. I think it was partly the android religion nonsense and then I think at the end they found out that androids can make babies with humans? And I was just like: No. I will believe that you can build androids that are hard to distinguish from humans. But that they have egg/sperm cells that can fuse with human egg/sperm cells? WTH. That is not how technology works. That is not how biology works. If they have cells with DNA – and DNA that is this close to humans, too – then they’re not androids at all. They’re just clones. And they should not have differently colored blood or brains that work like computers. That’s why I wrote “jumped the shark” – the writers introduced a new plot element that destroys the entire premise of the show.
Many thanks for taking the time to reply. I have copied and pasted for my sons GCSE on ethics……
Come on Netflix or Amazon…. Save This Show!
Another one bites the dust. Yet another good programme falls by the wayside as the dross on our airwaves mounts up. All the family enjoyed Humans. Enough Sci Fi for us boys and enough left wing moralizing for everyone else, yes you sweetheart….
Login to Geektown